BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

academic-paper-writer

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Accelerates technical publication cycles by automating evidence-gathering and structured section development, enabling engineering teams to document research…

面向 CS / AI / ML 领域的证据驱动、分节推进的论文写作 Agent Skill。

103 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Accelerates technical publication cycles by automating evidence-gathering and structured section development, enabling engineering teams to document research findings and innovations with reduced writing overhead.

Research engineers and ML teams publishing academic papers or technical documentation in computer science domains.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer

By joshua-zyy

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me generate structured academic paper drafts with evidence-driven sections for CS research
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars103Contributors1Last updated2026-06-27LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Reddit

3 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 103 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 28d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
  • Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 103 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 28d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →