AER-Skills
Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating empirical methodology validation, replication compliance, and manuscript formatting—reducing revisio…
Agent skills that help you publish in the AER faster — identification-first empirics, AEA-compliant replication, Keith-Head intros, R&R rebuttals for AER / AER:Insights / AEJ. | 助你更快发表 AER 论文的 agent skill 栈：识别优先实证、AEA 合规复现、Keith Head 式引言、R&R 审稿回复，覆盖选题到投稿全流程。
- Generate AER-compliant replication documentation for submitted empirical papers
- Draft Keith-Head style introductions that position research within existing literature
- Compose R&R rebuttals addressing reviewer comments for AER submissions
Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating empirical methodology validation, replication compliance, and manuscript formatting—reducing revision cycles and time-to-submission for economics research.
Economics researchers and academic institutions targeting American Economic Review and AEJ publications.
https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/AER-Skills
By brycewang-stanford
How to Get It
claude plugins install brycewang-stanford/AER-Skills
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me generate AER-compliant replication documentation for submitted empirical papers
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 33 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 10d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 33 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 10d ago; license MIT.