BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to Claude Tool Reviews

Agent Gateway

Connector Infrastructure Usable

Open-source proxy supporting MCP and A2A protocols. Routes traffic across LLM providers with RBAC and content filtering. Agent-to-agent collaboration support.

2,351 starsApache-2.0 (commercial OK)FreeDeveloper setup
Fair rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

2.4K stars. Single gateway for all agentic AI traffic — essential for enterprises running multiple AI agents needing security and governance.

Enterprise teams running multiple AI agents that need centralized security, observability, and routing.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/agentgateway/agentgateway

By agentgateway

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop AppOpen the Customize panel in the sidebar → browse connectors → search and add. Works in Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and Claude Chat.
CostFree

Trust Signals Reviewed

Stars2,351Contributors125Last updated2026-04-10LicenseApache-2.0 (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-04-11 · scanner v1

Data & Access

Data processingPrompts sent to Anthropic API. Enterprise/Team plans exclude training.

Community Pulse Active

Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit

20 mentions across 2 sources

Reviewer notes

Reviewed review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Apache-2.0. Gateway/proxy pattern.

2026-05-10: Useful if you're running multiple agents across different LLM providers and need a single choke point for auth, routing, and content policy — the RBAC and MCP/A2A protocol support makes it a reasonable fit for enterprises trying to avoid per-agent security sprawl. The tradeoff is real: you're adding a critical path dependency, and with only one confirmed production mention, community adoption is still early. Config complexity scales fast with multi-provider policy rules. Worth watching, but teams with tight uptime requirements should stress-test failover before committing.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
4/5
Overall score3.15 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedApr 2026

← Back to Claude Tool Reviews

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →