ai-devkit
Standardizes how AI coding assistants receive and execute development tasks, reducing context switching and enabling consistent skill composition across mult…
A universal CLI toolkit for AI agent skills, enabling structured AI-assisted development across tools like Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and more.
- Define reusable code review checklists across Cursor and Claude Code
- Standardize refactoring workflows for consistent team style application
- Build multi-step debugging protocols callable from any AI assistant
Standardizes how AI coding assistants receive and execute development tasks, reducing context switching and enabling consistent skill composition across multiple tools. Cuts setup friction for teams using Cursor, Claude, or similar AI-assisted IDEs.
Development teams using multiple AI coding assistants who need a single interface to define, version, and reuse structured prompts and workflows.
https://github.com/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit
By codeaholicguy
How to Get It
claude plugins install codeaholicguy/ai-devkit
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me define reusable code review checklists across Cursor and Claude Code
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit
- Unused Asset "sherma_corpse.png" found on PS5 using a Devkit — Reddit · 8506 pts
- AMD Ryzen AI Halo – $4k AI Dev Kit — Hacker News · 374 pts
- On a Mission to Rework Ark's Creature AI, does anyone understand the basics behi — Reddit · 11 pts
3 mentions across 2 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,581 GitHub stars; 9 contributors; last commit 1d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,581 GitHub stars; 9 contributors; last commit 1d ago; license no license.