@ama-mcp/otter
Enables programmatic access to Otter data through MCP, reducing manual context-switching and allowing CI/CD pipelines to integrate transcription or meeting i…
Experimental package — This module provides a set of MCP tools to retrieve information from Otter
- Ask Claude to retrieve meeting transcripts from Otter for project documentation.
- Generate summaries of recorded team calls by pulling Otter data into analysis.
- Automate extraction of action items from recorded meetings stored in Otter.
Enables programmatic access to Otter data through MCP, reducing manual context-switching and allowing CI/CD pipelines to integrate transcription or meeting intelligence workflows into development workflows.
Engineering teams using Otter for meeting documentation who need to automate transcript retrieval or search within automated deployments.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ama-mcp/otter
By GitHub Actions
How to Get It
npx -y @ama-mcp/otter
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
Once it’s connected, paste this into Claude:
Retrieve meeting transcripts from Otter for project documentation
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Data & Access
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 57 GitHub stars; 41 contributors; last commit 1d ago; license BSD-3-Clause.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 57 GitHub stars; 41 contributors; last commit 1d ago; license BSD-3-Clause.