BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

anki-mcp-server

Connector Development Poor

MCP server for Anki via AnkiConnect

242 starsFreeNo code needed
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Integrates spaced-repetition learning into development workflows, enabling teams to retain technical knowledge, API patterns, and domain expertise at scale without context-switching to separate tools.

Engineering teams building institutional knowledge bases and onboarding programs requiring long-term information retention.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/nailuoGG/anki-mcp-server

By nailuoGG

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop AppOpen the Customize panel in the sidebar → browse connectors → search and add. Works in Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and Claude Chat.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into a Claude Code conversation. Claude will run it for you.
Command
claude mcp add anki-mcp-server -- npx -y anki-mcp-server

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars242Last updated2026-06-20Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-06-21 · scanner v1

Data & Access

Data processingPrompts sent to Anthropic API. Enterprise/Team plans exclude training.

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 242 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 1d ago; license no license.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.30 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 242 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 1d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →