BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

Skill Development Usable

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

1,987 starsFreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Accelerates empirical research workflows by providing pre-built, reproducible agent skills across social science domains, reducing time-to-insight and enabling non-specialists to conduct rigorous quantitative studies.

Research teams and data scientists conducting empirical studies in economics, sociology, psychology, or policy analysis.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Researc...

By brycewang-stanford

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars1,987Last updated2026-06-19Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-06-19 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,987 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
2/5
Versatility
5/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.15 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,987 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →