BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

autonomous-dev-team

Skill Development Poor
Works inClaude Code
Poor Scanned — metadata only

Eliminates manual triage and implementation overhead by automating issue-to-PR workflows, allowing engineering teams to focus on architecture and review rath…

Turns GitHub issues into merged PRs with zero human intervention. Powered by OpenClaw, supports Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Kiro CLI.

29 starsFreeQuick setup
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Eliminates manual triage and implementation overhead by automating issue-to-PR workflows, allowing engineering teams to focus on architecture and review rather than routine coding tasks.

Development teams seeking to reduce time-to-merge on routine features and reduce context-switching overhead.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team

By zxkane

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install zxkane/autonomous-dev-team

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me automate bug fixes from GitHub issues to merged pull requests without manual coding steps
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars29Contributors3Last updated2026-07-25Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Emerging

Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit

3 mentions across 2 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 29 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
4/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.30 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 29 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →