BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

Awesome-Journal-Skills

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating journal-specific formatting, citation standards, and submission guidelines across 200+ outlets, redu…

Journal-specific skill packs for Claude Code and Codex covering 200+ mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, and major Chinese outlets — spanning topic selection, submission strategy, table and formatting standards, and peer-review response workflows.

981 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating journal-specific formatting, citation standards, and submission guidelines across 200+ outlets, reducing manual compliance work and revision cycles.

Researchers and academics targeting high-impact journals who need rapid formatting alignment with journal-specific requirements and peer review response protocols.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

By brycewang-stanford

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
See repository README

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Identify publication strategy and target journal based on research topic
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars981Contributors5Last updated2026-08-09LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-13 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 318 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
4/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.25 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 318 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →