Awesome-Journal-Skills
Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating journal-specific formatting, citation standards, and submission guidelines across 200+ outlets, redu…
Journal-specific skill packs for Claude Code and Codex covering 200+ mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, and major Chinese outlets — spanning topic selection, submission strategy, table and formatting standards, and peer-review response workflows.
- Ask Claude to identify publication strategy and target journal based on research topic
- Generate table formatting and data presentation matching specific journal requirements
- Automate reviewer response drafting using journal-specific guidelines and standards
Accelerates academic publication workflows by automating journal-specific formatting, citation standards, and submission guidelines across 200+ outlets, reducing manual compliance work and revision cycles.
Researchers and academics targeting high-impact journals who need rapid formatting alignment with journal-specific requirements and peer review response protocols.
https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
By brycewang-stanford
How to Get It
See repository README
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Identify publication strategy and target journal based on research topic
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 318 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 318 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.