beatos
Centralizes beat inventory management and licensing compliance while enabling AI-powered catalog search, reducing manual tagging overhead and accelerating mu…
Local-first beat library built for producers — catalog, BPM/key analysis, license tiers & PDFs, tagged-MP3 + loopkit export, and assisted multi-platform publishing. Chat with your catalog via a built-in AI Agent (Claude · ChatGPT · DeepSeek), or wire it to any MCP client. Desktop + web.
- Ask Claude to organize your beat catalog by BPM and key for faster production workflow
- Generate license tier summaries for your beats to ensure correct commercial usage restrictions
- Find similar beats in your library by describing a sound you want to match
Centralizes beat inventory management and licensing compliance while enabling AI-powered catalog search, reducing manual tagging overhead and accelerating multi-platform distribution workflows for music production teams.
Music producers and label operations managing large beat libraries requiring metadata control, license tracking, and cross-platform publishing automation.
https://github.com/averatec0773/beatos
By averatec0773
How to Get It
claude plugins install averatec0773/beatos
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Organize my beat catalog by BPM and key for faster production workflow
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 28 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 2d ago; license Apache-2.0.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 28 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 2d ago; license Apache-2.0.