C.R.I.S.P
Bridges the gap between exploratory prototyping and production-ready code by enforcing structured practices that reduce rework and technical debt.
CRISP (the Mileva Method) is a 5-phase BA/PM methodology for AI implementors — Clarify, Results, Investigate, Spec, Prove — that takes a vague client brief to a locked, Claude Code-ready implementation spec before any code is written. It ships as Claude Code skills with a /crisp-orchestrator entry point and a machine-readable crisp-state.json that tracks project phase, plus mandatory Phase S outputs like logging, analytics, and agent-security specs.
- Validate architecture decisions before investing in full implementation
- Onboard junior developers with clear coding structure and checkpoints
- Reduce code review cycles by catching common structural issues early
Bridges the gap between exploratory prototyping and production-ready code by enforcing structured practices that reduce rework and technical debt.
AI agency owners, consultants, solo builders, and product managers using Claude Code or Cursor who need a repeatable discovery-to-spec process before building.
https://github.com/radekamirko/C.R.I.S.P
By radekamirko
How to Get It
git clone https://github.com/radekamirko/C.R.I.S.P — then drop its .claude/skills folder into your Claude Code project and run /crisp-orchestrator
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me validate architecture decisions before investing in full implementation
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit
- Crisp open source BA/PM framework for Claude Code(stop building the wrong thing) — Hacker News · 2 pts
- Jennifer Lopez set to produce NBC bio-terror drama C.R.I.S.P.R — Hacker News · 2 pts
2 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 51 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 76d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 51 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 76d ago; license MIT.