claude-council
Reduces blind spots in code review by surfacing multiple AI perspectives on architecture, security, and implementation—useful when a single model's answer is…
Claude Code plugin to consult multiple AI coding agents (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok) for diverse perspectives
- Validate API design against security models from multiple AI agents
- Review architecture decisions before major refactoring work
- Identify edge cases in error handling across different AI perspectives
Reduces blind spots in code review by surfacing multiple AI perspectives on architecture, security, and implementation—useful when a single model's answer isn't enough to build confidence.
Teams building critical systems who want to validate architectural decisions or security approaches against multiple AI viewpoints before committing to implementation.
https://github.com/hex/claude-council
By hex
How to Get It
claude plugins install hex/claude-council
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me validate API design against security models from multiple AI agents
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit
- Fire Emblem Three Houses Trivia: Claude's name being an alias was planned to be — Reddit · 169 pts
- I hacked together a “local LLM council” for code review using Claude Code + Chat — Reddit · 14 pts
- Council: Make Claude, Gemini & Codex debate your questions before answering — Reddit · 6 pts
3 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 636 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 6d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 636 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 6d ago; license MIT.