compact-adviser
Reduces Claude API costs and context window overhead by archiving completed work, enabling longer sessions without token bloat or hitting rate limits on larg…
"Work appears completed or recorded. Run /compact to save tokens."
- Ask Claude to compact conversation history when token usage becomes expensive.
- Generate a summarized checkpoint before starting a new code development phase.
- Automatically save completed work sections to reduce context window overhead.
Reduces Claude API costs and context window overhead by archiving completed work, enabling longer sessions without token bloat or hitting rate limits on large codebases.
Engineering teams using Claude for iterative development who need to manage token budgets across extended coding sessions.
https://github.com/kunchenguid/compact-adviser
By kunchenguid
How to Get It
claude plugins install kunchenguid/compact-adviser
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Compact conversation history when token usage becomes expensive
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 99 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 99 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.