BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

compass

Skill Development Poor
Works inClaude Code
Poor Scanned — metadata only

Enables teams to map dependencies, ownership, and relationships across codebases without external services, reducing vendor lock-in and latency while improvi…

Native, local-first knowledge graph engine for code and project artifacts—inspired by Graphify, built in Rust, and evolving beyond it.

144 starsFreeQuick setup
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Enables teams to map dependencies, ownership, and relationships across codebases without external services, reducing vendor lock-in and latency while improving security posture for sensitive projects.

Engineering teams managing large, distributed codebases needing offline dependency analysis and artifact relationship discovery.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/crabbuild/compass

By crabbuild

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install crabbuild/compass

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me generate a knowledge graph of my codebase to visualize dependencies between modules
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars144Last updated2026-08-27Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-27 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 144 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.30 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedAug 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 144 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →