DM-Code-Agent
Reduces security audit friction and code review bottlenecks by combining reasoning, planning, and retrieval—enabling teams to validate compliance and trace a…
Lightweight, auditable Python code agent (~1500 LOC) — ReAct + Planner + Reflexion + Hybrid RAG, with SWE-bench Lite eval and trace replay.
- Ask Claude to audit Python code for security vulnerabilities before deployment
- Generate detailed execution traces to understand why code failed compliance checks
- Find security issues in legacy codebases using the agent's reasoning and reflection
Reduces security audit friction and code review bottlenecks by combining reasoning, planning, and retrieval—enabling teams to validate compliance and trace agent decisions across code generation workflows.
Security-focused engineering teams and compliance consultants auditing AI-assisted code generation in regulated environments.
https://github.com/hwfengcs/DM-Code-Agent
By hwfengcs
How to Get It
claude plugins install hwfengcs/DM-Code-Agent
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Audit Python code for security vulnerabilities before deployment
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Reddit
- Job Agent: AI Job Applier - Free 3 month trial included (dm for code) — Reddit · 1 pts
- LitBuy is the best Agent. Use my invite Code for discounts if you need links or — Reddit
2 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 152 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 10d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 152 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 10d ago; license MIT.