BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

docx-cli

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Enables AI agents to work directly with Word documents while preserving formatting, reducing manual conversion steps and data loss in document-heavy workflows.

CLI for AI agents (Claude, Codex) to read, edit, and comment on .docx files with full format fidelity.

145 starsMIT (commercial OK)Free
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Enables AI agents to work directly with Word documents while preserving formatting, reducing manual conversion steps and data loss in document-heavy workflows. Critical for teams automating compliance, legal review, or technical documentation processes.

Engineering teams automating document processing pipelines with Claude or other AI agents.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/kklimuk/docx-cli

By kklimuk

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install kklimuk/docx-cli

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Review Word document sections and suggest edits without losing formatting
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars145Contributors1Last updated2026-07-18LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 145 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
  • Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
4/5
Overall score3.15 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 145 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →