erpaval
Reduces development cycle time by automating planning and validation phases through structured workflow routing, enabling teams to compound learnings across …
ERPAVal — autonomous software development. Six-phase Explore/Research/Plan/Act/Validate/Compound workflow with classifier-driven routing and a compounding lessons store.
- Automate multi-phase software development workflows from requirement exploration through validation
- Generate structured plans for complex engineering tasks with automatic phase routing and decision logic
- Build compounding knowledge base that improves development process decisions across repeated project iterations
Reduces development cycle time by automating planning and validation phases through structured workflow routing, enabling teams to compound learnings across projects and avoid recurring mistakes.
Engineering teams managing complex software projects seeking systematic approaches to reduce rework and accelerate delivery cycles.
https://github.com/theagenticguy/erpaval
By theagenticguy
How to Get It
claude plugins install theagenticguy/erpaval
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me automate multi-phase software development workflows from requirement exploration through validation
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 26 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 57d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
- Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 26 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 57d ago; license MIT.