BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

forgemax

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Reviewed

Reduces token consumption and server complexity by consolidating multiple MCP servers into a unified gateway, lowering operational overhead and latency for t…

Code Mode inspired local sandboxed MCP Gateway - collapses N servers x M tools into 2 tools (~1,000 tokens)

150 starsFreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces token consumption and server complexity by consolidating multiple MCP servers into a unified gateway, lowering operational overhead and latency for teams running distributed tool infrastructure.

Engineering teams managing multiple MCP servers seeking to minimize token usage and simplify tool orchestration.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/postrv/forgemax

By postrv

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
npm install -g forgemax — then: forgemax init (generate forge.toml), edit it to add your servers, forgemax doctor to validate, and run forgemax (serves MCP over stdio)

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me consolidate 10+ MCP servers into single Claude request
PrerequisitesNode.js/npm (or Homebrew, Scoop, cargo, or the shell installer); a forge.toml config listing your downstream MCP servers and tokens (generate with forgemax init)CostFree

Trust Signals Reviewed

Stars150Contributors1Last updated2026-05-14Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-18 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Active

Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit

1 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Reviewed review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Auto-assessment from April sweep — baseline scores pending hands-on review.

2026-04-18: Approved in April sweep: Solid community adoption with a clear description and active maintenance.

Things to check

  • Local sandboxing may introduce latency overhead depending on server load and network setup. Collapsing multiple servers into two tools can obscure which original server handles a specific tool, complicating debugging.
  • Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedApr 2026

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →