BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

game-design-skills-bundle

Skill Security Poor
Works inClaude Code
Poor Scanned — metadata only

Accelerates game design decisions by codifying emotional direction, feature validation, and risk assessment workflows.

A public OpenClaw and ClawHub-ready bundle of game design skills for emotional direction, feature workflows, audits, FTUE, pitch decks, prototyping, and red-team design review.

36 starsFreeQuick setup
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Accelerates game design decisions by codifying emotional direction, feature validation, and risk assessment workflows. Reduces iteration cycles on untested mechanics and narrative beats.

Game studios and indie developers validating designs before production investment, especially those running compressed timelines or limited prototyping budgets.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/Stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle

By Stanestane

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install Stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me audit new feature mechanics against emotional design intent
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars36Contributors2Last updated2026-06-26Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Reddit

1 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 36 GitHub stars; 2 contributors; last commit 29d ago; license no license.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.05 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 36 GitHub stars; 2 contributors; last commit 29d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →