gentle-shell
Provides structured development governance through enforced specification-driven design, test-driven development verification, and peer review workflows—redu…
Turn Pi into el Gentleman: a senior-architect development harness with SDD/OpenSpec, subagents, strict TDD evidence, review guardrails, and skill discovery.
- Generate architecture diagrams and specifications using structured design-driven development methodology
- Automate code review workflows with strict test-driven development evidence requirements
- Discover and integrate specialized AI subagents for specific development tasks and domains
Provides structured development governance through enforced specification-driven design, test-driven development verification, and peer review workflows—reducing architectural drift and integration defects in distributed teams.
Engineering teams adopting specification-driven development who need automated guardrails for architecture compliance and TDD evidence collection.
https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/gentle-shell
By Gentleman-Programming
How to Get It
claude plugins install Gentleman-Programming/gentle-shell
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me generate architecture diagrams and specifications using structured design-driven development methodology
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 916 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 916 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.