gortex
Reduces token consumption in AI-assisted coding by 94% through semantic code indexing, directly lowering inference costs and latency for large-scale codebases.
High-performance code intelligence engine that indexes repositories into an in-memory knowledge graph and exposes it via CLI, MCP Server, and web UI. Built for AI coding agents - expose only needed information - one get_editing_context call replaces 5-10 file reads, cutting token usage by ~94%.
- AI agent fetches editing context for bugfix without reading 10+ files
- Codebase search by intent (e.g., 'all auth handlers') instead of grep
- Incremental indexing for CI/CD pipeline code review automation
Reduces token consumption in AI-assisted coding by 94% through semantic code indexing, directly lowering inference costs and latency for large-scale codebases. Replaces repeated file reads with single, focused context retrieval calls.
Teams running AI coding agents on large repositories who need to minimize token usage, API costs, and context window pressure without losing code understanding.
https://github.com/zzet/gortex
By zzet
How to Get It
claude plugins install zzet/gortex
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me AI agent fetches editing context for bugfix without reading 10+ files
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Emerging
Discussed on Hacker News
- Show HN: Gortex – MCP server for cross-repo code intelligence — Hacker News · 3 pts
1 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 944 GitHub stars; 20 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 944 GitHub stars; 20 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.