BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

headroom

Skill Development Recommended
Works inClaude Code
Recommended Scanned — metadata only

Reduces token consumption by 20–95% depending on data type, directly lowering LLM API costs and latency for agentic workflows without sacrificing output qual…

Compress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 20% fewer tokens for coding agents, 60-95% fewer tokens for JSON, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.

62,381 starsApache-2.0 (commercial OK)Free

Reduces token consumption by 20–95% depending on data type, directly lowering LLM API costs and latency for agentic workflows without sacrificing output quality or accuracy.

Engineering teams running coding agents or RAG systems with high-volume log/JSON processing needing to optimize token spend.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroom

By headroomlabs-ai

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install headroomlabs-ai/headroom

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me reduce token usage when feeding large code files into Claude for analysis
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars62,381Contributors229Last updated2026-07-25LicenseApache-2.0 (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 62,381 GitHub stars; 229 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
4/5
Versatility
5/5
Reliability
5/5
Security
4/5
Overall score4.50 / 5.00 RecommendedEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 62,381 GitHub stars; 229 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →