inspector
Reduces debugging cycles and integration failures by providing real-time visibility into MCP server behavior, request/response flows, and app interactions—cr…
Testing and evaluation platform to chat, inspect, and debug MCP servers, MCP apps, and ChatGPT apps.
- Debug MCP server issues by inspecting real-time request and response messages.
- Test ChatGPT app integrations before deploying to production environments.
- Evaluate MCP app behavior by chatting with it and capturing detailed logs.
Reduces debugging cycles and integration failures by providing real-time visibility into MCP server behavior, request/response flows, and app interactions—critical when deploying Claude integrations at scale.
Platform engineering teams and MCP developers building and validating Claude-connected applications and server implementations.
https://github.com/MCPJam/inspector
By MCPJam
How to Get It
npx @mcpjam/inspector@latest # or use the hosted app at app.mcpjam.com (no install needed)
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me debug MCP server issues by inspecting real-time request and response messages
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News
- Firefox Developer Tools: Accessibility inspector — Hacker News · 441 pts
- Microsoft Application Inspector — Hacker News · 419 pts
- Firefox’s New WebSocket Inspector — Hacker News · 398 pts
3 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 2,026 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 2,026 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.