korean-privacy-terms

Name: korean-privacy-terms Review
Item: korean-privacy-terms
Rating: 3.0
Author: Aaron Matthews

Skill Development Usable

한국 법령 기반 개인정보처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 Claude Code 스킬. 2025.4.21 작성지침 및 2026.3 개정 법령 반영.

Auto-generate privacy policy compliant with Korea PIPA regulations
Create terms of service templates for Korean web/mobile apps
Update existing policies to reflect 2026 regulatory changes

214 starsApache-2.0 (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup

Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Why it matters

Reduces legal compliance risk and drafting time for Korean privacy policies and terms of service. Ensures alignment with current Korean data protection regulations.

Best for

Korean startups and companies building SaaS or digital products needing legally compliant privacy policies and user agreements.

Works in

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

Source

https://github.com/kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms

By kimlawtech

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → Plugins → Add plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.

Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.

Command

claude plugins install kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars214Contributors1Last updated2026-04-22LicenseApache-2.0 (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-04-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Growing

Discussed on Reddit

Jason Collins: "A few months ago, my family released a short statement saying I — Reddit · 15271 pts
[New Update]: AIO? My coworker took video of me outside of work to "prove" I'm n — Reddit · 5293 pts
[New Update]: AIO? My coworker took video of me outside of work to "prove" I'm n — Reddit · 4949 pts

9 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 214 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 28d ago; license Apache-2.0.

Things to check

Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation Scores

Evaluation

Ease of Use

3/5

Versatility

3/5

Reliability

3/5

Security

3/5

Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedMay 2026

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 214 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 28d ago; license Apache-2.0.

← Back to the Claude Observatory