BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

korean-report-skills

Skill Documents & Content Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Eliminates quality issues in Korean-language document generation, ensuring professional tone and formatting standards that prevent communication breakdown wi…

Claude가 만든 한국어 문서가 어딘가 이상할 때 — 문장 표현과 디자인을 보완하는 Agent Skills

44 starsApache-2.0 (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Eliminates quality issues in Korean-language document generation, ensuring professional tone and formatting standards that prevent communication breakdown with Korean stakeholders and customers.

Teams generating Korean business documents, reports, or communications requiring native-standard quality without dedicated Korean copywriting resources.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/JangHyun-bin/korean-report-skills

By JangHyun-bin

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install JangHyun-bin/korean-report-skills

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Review Korean business reports for natural phrasing and grammar corrections
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars44Last updated2026-08-11LicenseApache-2.0 (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-11 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 44 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.75 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedAug 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 44 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license Apache-2.0.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →