mcp-adr-analysis-server
ADR analysis automates extraction of architectural rationale and decision history from your codebase, reducing onboarding friction and ensuring design decisi…
A sophisticated Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for analyzing Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) and providing deep architectural insights to AI agents.
- Extract decision rationale from ADR files to brief new team members
- Audit architectural consistency across microservices and service boundaries
- Generate architecture documentation from legacy decision records
ADR analysis automates extraction of architectural rationale and decision history from your codebase, reducing onboarding friction and ensuring design decisions survive team turnover.
Architects and senior engineers who need to audit or document existing architectural decisions embedded in code repositories.
https://github.com/tosin2013/mcp-adr-analysis-server
By tosin2013
How to Get It
claude mcp add mcp-adr-analysis-server -- npx -y mcp-adr-analysis-server
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
Once it’s connected, paste this into Claude:
Help me extract decision rationale from ADR files to brief new team members
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Data & Access
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit
- MCP ADR Analysis Server — Hacker News · 1 pts
- ADR based development — Reddit · 1 pts
2 mentions across 2 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 33 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 33 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.