mcp-local-rag
Enables teams to search proprietary code and documentation using semantic understanding without external APIs or cloud dependencies, reducing latency and eli…
Local-first RAG server for developers. Semantic + keyword search for code and technical docs. Works with MCP or CLI. Fully private, zero setup.
- Ask Claude to search your codebase for functions matching a specific design pattern.
- Generate documentation summaries by querying local technical docs semantically.
- Find relevant code examples across private repositories without uploading anywhere.
Enables teams to search proprietary code and documentation using semantic understanding without external APIs or cloud dependencies, reducing latency and eliminating data exposure risks.
Development teams managing large internal codebases or knowledge bases requiring fast, private semantic search across technical documentation.
https://github.com/shinpr/mcp-local-rag
By shinpr
How to Get It
claude mcp add mcp-local-rag -- npx -y mcp-local-rag
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
Once it’s connected, paste this into Claude:
Search my codebase for functions matching a specific design pattern
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Data & Access
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Reddit
- I built a fully local AI plugin for Obsidian – RAG, workflows, MCP, all on local — Reddit · 45 pts
- Hardware Suggestions for Local LLM with RAG and MCP for Nonprofit — Reddit · 23 pts
- Looking for a local simple MCP that supports RAG like search where I can upload — Reddit · 12 pts
3 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 363 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 13d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 363 GitHub stars; 6 contributors; last commit 13d ago; license MIT.