BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

meowmeow

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces ambiguity when prompting Claude by establishing a single, predictable trigger word with four distinct semantic meanings.

a philosophy for talking to AI agents without getting glazed. one trigger, four meanings. /meow.

34 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces ambiguity when prompting Claude by establishing a single, predictable trigger word with four distinct semantic meanings. Cuts down iteration cycles when building agent workflows that rely on precise instruction routing.

Teams building Claude-based agents or batch workflows who need consistent, low-overhead signaling for intent without verbose prompt engineering.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/meowmeow

By AgriciDaniel

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install AgriciDaniel/meowmeow

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me route agent behavior between four modes with single trigger word
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars34Contributors1Last updated2026-04-26LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Active

Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit

3 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 34 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 90d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
  • Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.75 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 34 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 90d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →