BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

Miro Connector

Connector Communication Solid
Works inClaude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat
Solid Scanned — metadata only

Connects Claude to Miro boards for reading and editing whiteboard content.

FreeNo code needed
Built and maintained by Anthropic, the makers of Claude.
Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://claude.com/connectors/miro

By Miro (RealtimeBoard, Inc.)

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop AppOpen the Customize panel in the sidebar → browse connectors → search and add. Works in Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and Claude Chat.

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Not yet scanned. Learn how to check this tool yourself.

Data & Access

Data processingProcessed by Anthropic (the makers of Claude)

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Miro's developer docs (developers.miro.com/docs/miro-mcp) are solid and standards-based: OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, 20+ named tools, and an explicit statement that it 'respects all existing board permissions and access controls.' It is Enterprise-admin-gated ('Your Admin must enable the MCP Server for your organization') — real deployment friction for smaller clients, but also a sensible control given full board write access is otherwise undocumented in scope. Miro is a well-established, widely deployed collaboration product (~14 years, unicorn scale). A live community thread (community.miro.com) documents users hitting an 'Invalid or expired consent token' error during the OAuth flow. | Sentiment: Miro's own community forum has a live user-reported bug thread on the connection flow ('Issue connecting Claude to Miro', community.miro.com); no broader Reddit/HN sentiment found. | Ensemble: median of 107 independent doc+sentiment evaluations (official-coverage sweep 2026-07-23).

Things to check

  • Enterprise-plan/admin-enablement required, not self-serve for smaller accounts; a documented OAuth consent-token-expiry bug exists in the wild.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
4/5
Versatility
4/5
Reliability
4/5
Security
4/5
Overall score4.00 / 5.00 SolidEvaluatedJul 2026
Miro's developer docs (developers.miro.com/docs/miro-mcp) are solid and standards-based: OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, 20+ named tools, and an explicit statement that it 'respects all existing board permissions and access controls.' It is Enterprise-admin-gated ('Your Admin must enable the MCP Server for your organization') — real deployment friction for smaller clients, but also a sensible control given full board write access is otherwise undocumented in scope. Miro is a well-established, widely deployed collaboration product (~14 years, unicorn scale). A live community thread (community.miro.com) documents users hitting an 'Invalid or expired consent token' error during the OAuth flow. | Sentiment: Miro's own community forum has a live user-reported bug thread on the connection flow ('Issue connecting Claude to Miro', community.miro.com); no broader Reddit/HN sentiment found. | Ensemble: median of 107 independent doc+sentiment evaluations (official-coverage sweep 2026-07-23).

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →