nihaixia
Enables rapid classical Chinese medicine diagnosis through structured formulas and case-based reasoning, reducing diagnostic time and improving consistency f…
倪海厦视角的中医Agent Skill,基于倪海厦教学资料开发,蒸馏倪师伤寒论、金匮要略、黄帝内经、神农本草经、针灸篇等,人纪/医案/经方思维,8个诊断公式+快速诊断流程图+脉舌速查+七步走思维模式(v2.1.0新增),蒸馏129条伤寒论 · 23篇金匮 · 71篇黄帝内经 · 345种本草 · 849个医案 · 2,452页讲义
- Ask Claude to diagnose traditional Chinese medicine conditions using Ni Haixia's classical frameworks and formulas.
- Generate herbal remedy recommendations based on symptoms matched against 345 documented substances and medical cases.
- Find relevant acupuncture treatment points and protocols by inputting patient pulse, tongue, and symptom descriptions.
Enables rapid classical Chinese medicine diagnosis through structured formulas and case-based reasoning, reducing diagnostic time and improving consistency for practitioners using evidence from historical medical texts.
Chinese medicine practitioners and clinics requiring systematic diagnostic workflows based on classical frameworks.
https://github.com/jangviktor-web/nihaixia
By jangviktor-web
How to Get It
claude plugins install jangviktor-web/nihaixia
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Diagnose traditional Chinese medicine conditions using Ni Haixia's classical frameworks and formulas
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,952 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 1,952 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.