omop_mcp
Reduces manual effort and error in clinical data standardization by automating terminology mapping to OMOP common data models, enabling consistent analytics …
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for mapping clinical terminology to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) concepts using Large Language Models
- Ask Claude to map clinical diagnosis codes to standardized OMOP concept identifiers
- Generate OMOP-compliant data structures from unstructured clinical notes and terminology
- Find appropriate OMOP concept mappings for custom medical vocabulary terms quickly
Reduces manual effort and error in clinical data standardization by automating terminology mapping to OMOP common data models, enabling consistent analytics across healthcare systems.
Healthcare IT teams and data engineers integrating clinical data pipelines requiring OMOP standardization.
https://github.com/OHNLP/omop_mcp
By OHNLP
How to Get It
claude mcp add omop_mcp -- npx -y omop_mcp
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
Once it’s connected, paste this into Claude:
Map clinical diagnosis codes to standardized OMOP concept identifiers
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Data & Access
Community Pulse Active
Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit
- Show HN: Open-Source FHIR –> OMOP Pipeline — Hacker News · 2 pts
1 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 39 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 75d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
- Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 39 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 75d ago; license no license.