BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

open-cowork

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces vendor lock-in and licensing costs by enabling teams to run collaborative AI coding workflows on-premises or with their own cloud infrastructure whil…

Open-source alternative to Claude Co-Work built by Claude Mythos 5. with BYOK

122 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces vendor lock-in and licensing costs by enabling teams to run collaborative AI coding workflows on-premises or with their own cloud infrastructure while maintaining feature parity with commercial alternatives.

Engineering teams seeking cost-effective, self-hosted AI-assisted development without third-party service dependencies.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/coasty-ai/open-cowork

By coasty-ai

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install coasty-ai/open-cowork

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me automate code reviews and testing across multiple project repositories simultaneously
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars122Last updated2026-07-29LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-29 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 122 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 122 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →