open-science-skills
Embeds reproducible research methodology into AI agents, reducing documentation gaps and ensuring experimental work meets publication standards without manua…
A library of Agentic Skills for Claude Code and LLM agents, codified from social science standards and methodological texts for doing experimental and other kinds of work.
- Ask Claude to design a randomized controlled trial protocol following established social science standards.
- Generate reproducible experiment documentation that meets open science methodology requirements.
- Automate validation of research methods against peer-reviewed social science best practices.
Embeds reproducible research methodology into AI agents, reducing documentation gaps and ensuring experimental work meets publication standards without manual compliance overhead.
Research-driven teams and academic consultants implementing AI-assisted experimental design and data analysis workflows.
https://github.com/scdenney/open-science-skills
By scdenney
How to Get It
claude plugins install scdenney/open-science-skills
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Design a randomized controlled trial protocol following established social science standards
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 34 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
- Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 34 GitHub stars; 1 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license no license.