BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

pingfusi

Skill Productivity Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces costly agent iterations and prevents merged defects by embedding human review checkpoints within AI-assisted development workflows, enabling faster f…

MCP server + CLI that puts a real human in your coding agent's loop. It publishes work mid-task, a reviewer pins what's wrong and returns a verdict, and the agent iterates until approved.

114 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces costly agent iterations and prevents merged defects by embedding human review checkpoints within AI-assisted development workflows, enabling faster feedback cycles without sacrificing code quality.

Engineering teams using AI coding agents who need asynchronous human oversight before task completion.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/alex-durango/pingfusi

By alex-durango

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install alex-durango/pingfusi

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Pause code changes for human review before committing to main branch
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars114Contributors4Last updated2026-09-09LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-09-17 · scanner v1

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 109 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedAug 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 109 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →