qaskills
Standardizes QA skill definitions for AI coding agents, reducing inconsistent test coverage and enabling reliable assessment of agent testing capabilities ac…
Curated directory of QA-testing skills for AI coding agents, installed one at a time via the @qaskills/cli npm tool. The CLI detects your agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, and 27+ others) and installs skills like playwright-e2e so the agent writes tests using Page Object Model, fixtures, and testing best practices. Includes search, list, and remove commands.
- Find testing patterns and best practices for your AI coding agent to implement automated test suites.
- Generate comprehensive test strategies by referencing curated QA skills specific to your codebase.
- Ask Claude to write test cases using industry-standard testing skills from the QA directory.
Standardizes QA skill definitions for AI coding agents, reducing inconsistent test coverage and enabling reliable assessment of agent testing capabilities across teams.
QA teams integrating AI coding agents seeking structured skill validation and capability benchmarking.
https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskills
By PramodDutta
How to Get It
npx @qaskills/cli add <skill-name> (e.g. npx @qaskills/cli add playwright-e2e; the CLI auto-detects Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and 27+ other agents)
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me find testing patterns and best practices for my AI coding agent to implement automated test suites
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Hacker News
- Testers might know QA skills. Here's how to get industry domain knowledge too — Hacker News · 2 pts
- Ask HN: Can software qa skills translate to telecommuting gigs? — Hacker News · 1 pts
2 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 137 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
- Single maintainer. Consider the risk if this person stops maintaining the project.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 137 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.