BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

reticle

Skill Development Poor
Works inClaude Code
Poor Scanned — metadata only

Enables AI agents to verify code behavior in real time rather than relying on static generation, reducing hallucination-driven bugs and incomplete implementa…

AI agents can generate code, but they still struggle to understand what they build. Reticle gives them runtime perception of web applications.

297 starsFreeQuick setup
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Enables AI agents to verify code behavior in real time rather than relying on static generation, reducing hallucination-driven bugs and incomplete implementations that reach production.

Engineering teams integrating AI code generation into development workflows who need runtime validation before deployment.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle

By reticlehq

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install reticlehq/reticle

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Debug a web app by observing actual runtime behavior and state changes
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars297Last updated2026-08-15Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-15 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 297 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.30 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedAug 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 297 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →