BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

sense

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces debugging time and integration risk by giving AI agents precise codebase context—symbol relationships, change impact, and project patterns—instead of…

MCP server for AI coding agents - gives Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, and Codex CLI structural understanding of your codebase: symbol graph, blast radius, semantic search, conventions.

25 starsMIT (commercial OK)Free
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces debugging time and integration risk by giving AI agents precise codebase context—symbol relationships, change impact, and project patterns—instead of blind file searching.

Engineering teams using Claude or Cursor for code generation and refactoring who need AI agents to understand large, unfamiliar codebases.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/luuuc/sense

By luuuc

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install luuuc/sense

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Find all functions affected by changing a specific database schema field
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars25Contributors3Last updated2026-07-25LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 25 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
4/5
Security
4/5
Overall score3.15 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 25 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →