SHAFT_ENGINE
Reduces test maintenance overhead and accelerates E2E coverage across web, mobile, API, and database layers with a unified framework, lowering regression ris…
Java test automation framework for web, mobile, API, CLI, database, and desktop E2E testing with a fluent API and built-in reporting.
- Generate end-to-end test scripts for web applications without writing boilerplate code
- Automate mobile app testing across iOS and Android with consistent fluent syntax
- Build API and database validation tests alongside UI tests in one framework
Reduces test maintenance overhead and accelerates E2E coverage across web, mobile, API, and database layers with a unified framework, lowering regression risk and time-to-release.
QA teams and engineering leads adopting Java-based test automation across multi-platform applications.
https://github.com/ShaftHQ/SHAFT_ENGINE
By ShaftHQ
How to Get It
Add the Maven dependency io.github.shafthq:shaft-engine (Maven Central); for the optional MCP/agentic module see https://shafthq.github.io/docs/agentic/mcp
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me generate end-to-end test scripts for web applications without writing boilerplate code
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Hacker News
- Twitter's only black engineer in leadership quits — Hacker News · 106 pts
- Ask HN: What would a car engine look like that was robot serviceable? — Hacker News · 29 pts
2 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 391 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 391 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.