skillranker
Dynamically ranks agent capabilities against live session context, reducing wasted cycles on misaligned tool selection and improving LLM agent efficiency in …
Rust CLI powered by Jev from TypeSafe.ai that ranks agent skills for the next step using live session context. Includes Claude Code hooks, structured JSON, abstention, and local feedback. Requires a TypeSafe API key.
- Ask Claude to rank which agent skills are needed next based on current session context.
- Generate structured JSON feedback on agent skill performance during live development sessions.
- Automate skill evaluation decisions with local feedback loops and optional abstention handling.
Dynamically ranks agent capabilities against live session context, reducing wasted cycles on misaligned tool selection and improving LLM agent efficiency in multi-skill scenarios.
Teams building multi-agent systems or agentic workflows that need runtime skill prioritization based on execution state.
https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/skillranker
By Dicklesworthstone
How to Get It
claude plugins install Dicklesworthstone/skillranker
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Rank which agent skills are needed next based on current session context
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 52 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 52 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.