BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

skillranker

Skill Development Poor
Works inClaude Code
Poor Scanned — metadata only

Dynamically ranks agent capabilities against live session context, reducing wasted cycles on misaligned tool selection and improving LLM agent efficiency in …

Rust CLI powered by Jev from TypeSafe.ai that ranks agent skills for the next step using live session context. Includes Claude Code hooks, structured JSON, abstention, and local feedback. Requires a TypeSafe API key.

52 starsFreeQuick setup
Below standard — Significant caveats apply. Not recommended without careful review of the security and evaluation sections.

Dynamically ranks agent capabilities against live session context, reducing wasted cycles on misaligned tool selection and improving LLM agent efficiency in multi-skill scenarios.

Teams building multi-agent systems or agentic workflows that need runtime skill prioritization based on execution state.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/skillranker

By Dicklesworthstone

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install Dicklesworthstone/skillranker

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Rank which agent skills are needed next based on current session context
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars52Last updated2026-09-19Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-09-19 · scanner v1

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 52 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
1/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score2.30 / 5.00 PoorEvaluatedSep 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 52 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license no license.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →