superpowers-v
Reduces documentation preparation time and errors by automating code archaeology, audience validation, and library verification in parallel before writing ex…
Compound V — sidekick to Superpowers. Triple parallel pre-flight (code archaeology + domain-expert with audience search + library/doc validator via Context7), Disjoint File Partition Map, batched parallel Opus dispatch. Auto-intercepts brainstorming → writing-plans → execution transitions.
- Generate comprehensive writing plans from brainstorming notes before execution begins.
- Validate documentation against library standards and audience requirements simultaneously.
- Analyze codebases for patterns and dependencies across multiple files in parallel.
Reduces documentation preparation time and errors by automating code archaeology, audience validation, and library verification in parallel before writing execution. Catches misalignment between brainstorm and final output early.
Technical writers and content teams handling large codebases needing fast, accurate documentation workflows with minimal rework cycles.
https://github.com/procoders/superpowers-v
By procoders
How to Get It
claude plugins install procoders/superpowers-v
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me generate comprehensive writing plans from brainstorming notes before execution begins
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse New
No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 30 GitHub stars; 2 contributors; last commit 8d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 30 GitHub stars; 2 contributors; last commit 8d ago; license MIT.