tree-sitter-analyzer
Multi-language code analysis using tree-sitter parsing. Works as both CLI tool and MCP server, covering 60+ languages with AST-level understanding.
A scalable, multi-language code analysis framework based on Tree-sitter, usable both as a CLI tool and an MCP server.
- Analyze code structure accurately across sixty programming languages
- Get syntax-aware search results with symbol and scope awareness
- Parse unfamiliar codebases using language-specific grammar rules
Multi-language code analysis using tree-sitter parsing. Works as both CLI tool and MCP server, covering 60+ languages with AST-level understanding.
Developers working across multiple programming languages who need Claude to have accurate syntax-aware code analysis.
https://github.com/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer
By aimasteracc
How to Get It
See repository README
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me analyze code structure accurately across sixty programming languages
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Reddit
- Built a Tree-sitter powered codebase analyzer that gives Claude better context — Reddit · 25 pts
- analyze-reify: a Rust/tree-sitter based CLI that analyzes clojure code for occur — Reddit · 19 pts
- [Media] Any neovim users here? Can you help me figure out why I'm getting this p — Reddit · 16 pts
3 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 42 GitHub stars; 7 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Requires familiarity with Tree-sitter grammar and AST traversal; not a drop-in replacement for established linters like ESLint or Pylint. Grammar support varies by language maturity and community maintenance.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 42 GitHub stars; 7 contributors; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.