BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

wind

Skill Development Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces Flutter UI development friction by enabling Tailwind-style utility composition, lowering context switching costs for teams familiar with web styling …

Tailwind CSS for Flutter — classes like flex, p-4, dark:bg-gray-800 compose into widget trees. MCP server + Claude Code skill for AI agents.

27 starsMIT (commercial OK)Free
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces Flutter UI development friction by enabling Tailwind-style utility composition, lowering context switching costs for teams familiar with web styling conventions and accelerating prototyping cycles.

Flutter teams adopting utility-first design patterns and AI-assisted development workflows.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/fluttersdk/wind

By fluttersdk

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install fluttersdk/wind

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me generate Flutter widget layouts using Tailwind-style class names for rapid prototyping
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars27Contributors3Last updated2026-07-21LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-07-25 · scanner v1

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 27 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 4d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
2/5
Reliability
4/5
Security
4/5
Overall score3.15 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJul 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 27 GitHub stars; 3 contributors; last commit 4d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →