BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

wmux

Skill Productivity Usable
Works inClaude Code
Usable Scanned — metadata only

Reduces friction for Windows-based AI agent workflows by enabling native terminal multiplexing without WSL overhead, allowing seamless coordination across mu…

Windows tmux alternative for AI agents — split terminals for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI with MCP browser automation. No WSL required.

325 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup
Usable rating — This tool is functional but has notable gaps. Review the evaluation notes below before deploying.

Reduces friction for Windows-based AI agent workflows by enabling native terminal multiplexing without WSL overhead, allowing seamless coordination across multiple AI CLI tools and browser automation tasks.

Windows-based engineering teams running AI agent workflows with multiple concurrent Claude, Codex, and Gemini CLI sessions.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/openwong2kim/wmux

By openwong2kim

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install openwong2kim/wmux

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.

First thing to try

After installing, paste this into Claude:

Help me automate parallel Claude AI agent tasks across multiple split terminal windows simultaneously
CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars325Contributors18Last updated2026-08-05LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-08-13 · scanner vattempted-no-data

Community Pulse Emerging

Discussed on Hacker News

1 mentions across 1 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 140 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

Things to check

  • Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
3/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.00 / 5.00 UsableEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 140 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 0d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →