wmux
Reduces friction for Windows-based AI agent workflows by enabling native terminal multiplexing without WSL overhead, allowing seamless coordination across mu…
Windows tmux alternative for AI agents — split terminals for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI with MCP browser automation. No WSL required.
- Automate parallel Claude AI agent tasks across multiple split terminal windows simultaneously.
- Manage Claude Code and Codex outputs side-by-side without switching between terminal tabs.
- Run browser automation scripts while monitoring AI agent logs in separate panes.
Reduces friction for Windows-based AI agent workflows by enabling native terminal multiplexing without WSL overhead, allowing seamless coordination across multiple AI CLI tools and browser automation tasks.
Windows-based engineering teams running AI agent workflows with multiple concurrent Claude, Codex, and Gemini CLI sessions.
https://github.com/openwong2kim/wmux
By openwong2kim
How to Get It
claude plugins install openwong2kim/wmux
Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.
Auto-generated from the tool's public listing — not hands-on verified. Cross-check against the source repo's README before running.
After installing, paste this into Claude:
Help me automate parallel Claude AI agent tasks across multiple split terminal windows simultaneously
Trust Signals Auto-scanned
Community Pulse Growing
Discussed on Hacker News
- Show HN: Wmux – A workspace multiplexer for AI agents — Hacker News · 13 pts
- Show HN: Wmux – a native Windows terminal multiplexer for AI agents — Hacker News · 5 pts
2 mentions across 1 sources
Reviewer notes
Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 371 GitHub stars; 22 contributors; last commit 3d ago; license MIT.
Things to check
- Scanned, not hands-on tested — this entry was auto-scanned from public metadata (GitHub metrics, license, security flags). No reviewer has run it, and no tool-specific limitations have been documented yet.
How to evaluate tools before deploying →
Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.
Evaluation
catalog_hygiene stale-eval refresh: Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 371 GitHub stars; 22 contributors; last commit 3d ago; license MIT.