BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

Wrike

Connector Productivity Solid
Works inClaude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat
Solid Scanned — metadata only

Lets Claude manage, update, and move Wrike project work forward.

FreeNo code needed
Built and maintained by Anthropic, the makers of Claude.
Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://claude.com/connectors/wrike

By Wrike (Citrix)

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop AppOpen the Customize panel in the sidebar → browse connectors → search and add. Works in Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and Claude Chat.

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Not yet scanned. Learn how to check this tool yourself.

Data & Access

Data processingProcessed by Anthropic (the makers of Claude)

Community Pulse New

No community discussions found yet. This doesn't mean the tool isn't good — it may be new or serve a niche use case.

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

The page gives concrete example prompts (status reporting, cross-workspace search, converting meeting notes to tasks, flagging at-risk projects) and links to developers.wrike.com/wrike-mcp/, but states no auth model and no GA/beta status directly. Wrike is a mature project-management platform (est. 2006) owned by Citrix/Cloud Software Group, supporting solid reliability. Read & Write access covers task/project creation and movement across workspaces — broad but largely non-sensitive PM metadata rather than financial/health data, and the missing on-page auth detail holds security to a middle score. | Sentiment: No search performed — WebSearch session budget and Firecrawl credits were both exhausted before a sentiment pass could run; no HN/Reddit signal gathered. | Ensemble: median of 9 independent doc+sentiment evaluations (official-coverage sweep 2026-07-23).

Things to check

  • No auth model or setup steps stated on the official connector page itself. No sentiment search was possible this session (WebSearch budget exhausted, Firecrawl at 0 credits).

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
3/5
Versatility
4/5
Reliability
4/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.50 / 5.00 SolidEvaluatedJul 2026
The page gives concrete example prompts (status reporting, cross-workspace search, converting meeting notes to tasks, flagging at-risk projects) and links to developers.wrike.com/wrike-mcp/, but states no auth model and no GA/beta status directly. Wrike is a mature project-management platform (est. 2006) owned by Citrix/Cloud Software Group, supporting solid reliability. Read & Write access covers task/project creation and movement across workspaces — broad but largely non-sensitive PM metadata rather than financial/health data, and the missing on-page auth detail holds security to a middle score. | Sentiment: No search performed — WebSearch session budget and Firecrawl credits were both exhausted before a sentiment pass could run; no HN/Reddit signal gathered. | Ensemble: median of 9 independent doc+sentiment evaluations (official-coverage sweep 2026-07-23).

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →