BrowseFull catalogOutcomesSolve a specific problemRolesStack by teamTrustFilter by risk tier
← Back to the Claude Observatory

three-man-team

Skill Development Solid

A structured 3-agent AI dev team — Architect, Builder, Reviewer. Built from production use. Token-optimized. Works with Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, and any AI that supports context files.

813 starsMIT (commercial OK)FreeQuick setup

Divides AI code generation into specialized agent roles (design, implementation, review), reducing hallucination and improving code quality in complex projects. Token-optimized to lower API costs on large codebases.

Teams using Claude Code, VS Code, or Cursor who need structured code review and architectural consistency without manual handoffs between design and implementation.

Claude Code Claude Cowork Claude Chat

https://github.com/russelleNVy/three-man-team

By russelleNVy

How to Get It

Option 1: Claude Desktop App (Code Mode)Click the + button next to the prompt box → PluginsAdd plugin. Search and click Install. Skills work in Claude Code only.
Option 2: Paste into Claude CodeCopy the command below and paste it into your conversation. Claude will install it.
Command
claude plugins install russelleNVy/three-man-team

Tip: Paste this into a Claude Code conversation. Verify command matches your Claude Code version.

CostFree

Trust Signals Auto-scanned

Stars813Last updated2026-05-27LicenseMIT (OK for commercial use)Known CVEsNone foundSources: GitHub Advisory Database + OSV.dev · Scanned 2026-06-03 · scanner v1

Community Pulse Active

Discussed on Hacker News, Reddit

12 mentions across 2 sources

Reviewer notes

Auto-scanned review. These are observations, not a security certification.

Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 813 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.

How to evaluate tools before deploying →

Data shown here comes from public APIs and automated scanning. Reviewer notes reflect one person's experience. This is not a security certification or legal recommendation. Always evaluate tools according to your own organization's policies.

Evaluation

Ease of Use
4/5
Versatility
4/5
Reliability
3/5
Security
3/5
Overall score3.60 / 5.00 SolidEvaluatedJun 2026
Scored from trust signals (evidence-eval-v1): 813 GitHub stars; contributors unknown; last commit 7d ago; license MIT.

← Back to the Claude Observatory

Rolling Claude out in your org? Let's talk.

Start a conversation →